Proposal (#19) to South American Check-list Committee:
Elevate Phacellodomus
maculipectus to species rank
Effect on South American
CL: this proposal
would split Phacellodomus striaticollis (Freckle-breasted
Thornbird) into two species, P. striaticollis and P. maculipectus.
Background: Two Phacellodomus taxa
treated as subspecies in our baseline list have been treated as full species by
recent authors, including Nores, Ridgely, and Whitney. One, striaticollis,
is a lowland taxon found in thickets near marshes or other water (SE Brazil to
EC Argentina), whereas the other, maculipectus, is an Andean forest bird
(S Bolivia to NW Argentina). They are sufficiently similar phenotypically that
their sister relationship has never been questioned, and they show a typical
biogeographic among close relatives in that one taxon is southern Andean
montane and the other is subtropical lowlands of S Brazil-N Argentina.
The taxonomic history of
the two is as follows:
Cory & Hellmayr (1925)
treated the two as conspecific, noting a half-dozen plumage differences between
the two but making no further comment [These authors often treated taxa as full
species that were lumped without comment by Peters.]
Peters (1951) followed this
treatment, as did Meyer de Schauensee (1966, 1970) and Sibley & Monroe
(1990).
Nores and Yzurieta (1981)
treated the two as separate species citing differences in nest structure,
voice, and iris color. Here's what they wrote:
"esta especie es
considerada actualmente como una raza de P. striaticollis, sin embargo
es lo suficientemente distinta para ser considerada especies,
no s—lo por sus caracter’sticas morfol—gicas, sino tambiŽn por sus costumbres.
En cuanto al color difiere
de striaticollis, entre otras cosas, por tener
las manchas pectorales m‡s marcasa; flancos
m‡s oscuros; frente con rayas clara m‡s conspicuas;
e iris pardo en vez de amarillo. Una diferencia notable
la constituye tambiŽn el tipo
de nido; en maculipectus es grande, trapezoidal y colgante
del externo de una rama, a
la manera de la mayor’a de
las especies del gŽnero,
mientras que en striaticollis es peque–o, de
forma esfŽrica, algo alargado y apoyado a ramas o horquetas. En el canto
existen tambiŽn diferencias apreciables: mientras en maculipectus es
fuerte, variado y casi siempre emitido a dśo con el otro integrante de la
pareja, en striaticollis es suave, mon—tono, compuesto de una serie de
silbos descendentes y generalmente emitido en forma individual."
Narosky and Yzurieta (1987)
followed this treatment and repeated some of the evidence above.
Ridgely & Tudor (1994)
followed this treatment, summarizing the evidence presented by Nores and
Yzurieta. However, they stated: "our experience does not support their
contention that the two taxa show marked vocal differences."
Whitney et al. (1994) also
considered the two as separate species: "We consider montane, forest-based
P. maculipectus to be a species distinct from widely disjunct P.
striaticollis of the marshes of southeastern Brazil south to Prov. Buenos
Aires, Argentina, following Narosky & Yzurieta (1987)."
Recommendation: Ideally, we'd all like to see
quantitative documentation published for the differences in nest structure and
voice. In fact, I like to think that one potentially beneficial outcome of our
Committee deliberations will be to encourage publication of formal analyses.
However, I think that the published anecdotal information is sufficient, in
this case, to place "burden of proof" on those who would treat these
as a single species. In fact, there may now exist more evidence for treating
these Phacellodomus as species than for a number of pairs of allopatric Funariidae
taxa for which species rank has been maintained largely by tradition. So, I
will vote YES on this one unless convinced otherwise by discussion
looking forward to hearing what others think.
English name: Cory & Hellmayr used
"Spotted-breasted", and this was followed by Whitney et al. Ridgely & Tudor used
"Spot-breasted." "Freckle-breasted" has been used both for
the broad and narrow striaticollis. Cory & Hellmayr used
"Rufous-headed Thornbird" for nominate striaticollis.
Discussion?
Lit Cit:
Narosky, T, & D.
Yzurieta (1987) Birds of Argentina & Uruguay. Asoc. Orn. del Plata.
Nores, M., & D. Yzurieta. (1981). Nuevas localidades para aves argentinas.
Historia Natural 2: 33-42.
Whitney, B. M., J. L. Rowlett, & R. A. Rowlett. (1994.) Distributional and
other noteworthy records for some Bolivian birds. Bull. Brit. Ornith. Club 114:
55-61.
Van Remsen, 5 June. 2002
================
Comments from Gary
Stiles:
"This kind of evidence seems convincing to me, though I would like
to see direct comparison of sonagrams along the Isler lines. Regarding
English names, I have no opinion without having seen the birds! However, I
suppose I might use this opportunity to indulge in airing one of my pet
peeves.. the use of Spot- instead of Spotted- (and similar constructions)
when the meaning is "many spots" rather than "one spot". To
me,
spot-breasted implies the latter, spotted-breasted, the former and one
loses a useful distinction by mixing the two (not a trivial matter with
3000+ species to name..). In other words, the gain in "simplicity and
euphony" does not compensate for the loss in precision (and where are
"simplicity and euphony" in such monsters as Northern Chestnut-tailed
Antbird?)"
Comments from Manuel
Nores:
"Si estoy de acuerdo con separar como especie a Phacellodomus
maculipectus. Para mi es muy diferente de striaticollis y pienso que
cantan distinto, a pesar de que Ridgely y Tudor dicen que el canto es
igual."
Comments from Alvaro
Jaramillo:
"Very much in favour of elevating maculipectus to species rank. I have had
experience with both taxa in Argentina, Bolivia and Uruguay. They differ in
voice, habitat, eye colour, details of plumage, nest structure etc. Descriptions
of the nests of the two taxa, are found in Narosky, Fraga and de la Pe–a 1983.
Nidificacion de las Aves Argentinas (Dendrocolaptidae y Funariidae). Asociacion
Ornitologica del Plata, Buenos Aires. The nest of Phacellodomus striaticollis
is unlike that of most Phacellodomus in that it does not hang, but is
supported from below by branches. In addition, the nest tends to be elongate.
In its nest structure striaticollis is more similar to ruber than
it is to maculipectus. I have a gut feeling that maculipectus and
striaticollis may not even be sister species. With regards to the songs,
I do have recordings of both but I am not sure where they are to make sonograms
for the committee to see. The songs do differ from each other as much as songs
of clearly unambiguously different species of Phacellodomus do. Contrary
to Nores and Yzurieta 1981, I think that both will sing as duets at least some
of the time. Perhaps striaticollis does it rarely, but I think it does
duet (based on recollection, hopefully I have a tape somewhere). "