Proposal (298) to South American Classification Committee
Change
English name of Cnipodectes to Twistwing (II)
In Proposal no. 184 (which I posted in October 2005), a majority
of SACC members voted in favour of changing the name of Cnipodectes
subbrunneus from Brownish Flycatcher to Brownish Twistwing (6-4).
However, due to SACC voting rules, the proposal was rejected as not achieving 7
votes. Interestingly, following committee member changes and the fact that
native Spanish or Portuguese speaking members no longer vote on English names,
if everyone who voted on the previous proposal and who still has a vote
maintains their vote on proposal 184, this one will now pass.
Committee membership changes and gripes about the SACC voting
system are not good reasons for a new proposal to be considered. There are
however important reasons to reconsider this issue. First, a new Cnipodectes
has been described from Peru (Proposal 297). It would be sensible to unite
these two congeners under the English name "Twistwing", given that
the two species share similarly modified primaries. Secondly, despite SACC's
approach and a willingness on the part of the ornithological community generally
to follow its recommendations, several authors of key publications have made a
point of not following SACC on the English name for Cnipodectes:
(i) Restall et al. 2006 Birds of Northern South America purported to use SACC
recommendations for English names throughout but, without drawing attention to
the point, used "Twistwing" for Cnipodectes; (ii) Salaman et
al. 2007 Checklist of Birds of Colombia followed SACC taxonomy and nomenclature
on all but a short list of specified issues, including usage of "Twistwing";
and (iii) the Auk allowed Lane et al. (2007) to use
"Twistwing" in assigning an English name for the new Cnipodectes species,
despite the AOU's own checklist committee having rejected the name for the
genus.
In summary, SACC's decision in Proposal 184 was supported only by a minority
of committee members; and other persons have gone out of their way to avoid
SACC's recommendation. Reasons of principle and usage for changing the name for
Cnipodectes were set out in Proposal 184. The SACC use of
"Flycatcher" is destabilising in the face of widespread use of the
name "Twistwing" and would create a novel name for a recently
described species, another avoidable negative outcome. I recommend a yes vote,
again.
Thomas Donegan
August 2007
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Comments from Remsen: "YES. In spite of the
numerous brilliant and cogent reasons I presented previously for retaining the
cherished and charismatic name Brownish Flycatcher for C. subbrunneus, I
recognize that the cutesy name Twistwing is here to stay. Add to the list of
traitorous capitulators: J. Fitzpatrick et al. in HBW, as well as the devious
and cunning Dan Lane, whose preferred name Rufous Twistwing for C. superrufus leaves
Rufous Flycatcher 'preoccupied' by Myiarchus semirufus. Wounded and
sulking, I remain coiled like a spring ready to retaliate with a barrage of NO
votes on subsequent proposals."
Comments from Stiles: "YES. I liked
"Twistwing" before and I like it now!"
Comments from Stotz: "YES. I hate to vote for
Twistwing, having voting against it in the past, but I guess I don't see a
clear alternative. The other option would be to create a new name for the
new species of Cnipodectes (the Lane et al Flycatcher or the Status Quo
Flycatcher?), which doesn't do much to maintain stability."
Comments from Jaramillo: "YES - I think Twistwing is
an absolutely fantastic name. The issue of Rufous Flycatcher being preoccupied
also clarifies this choice."
Comments from Robbins: "YES. I favored
"twistwing" the first go around. Perhaps we should now revisit the
English name for Neopipo, and get it right this time by calling it
Cinnamon Tyrant!"
Comments from Zimmer: "YES. I liked (and voted
for) "Twistwing" the first time around for subbrunneus, and
nothing since has changed my mind. The preoccupation of "Rufous
Flycatcher" by Myiarchus semirufus provides even further
ammunition for this change. I congratulate "the devious and cunning Dan
Lane" for engineering this coup, although the image of a "wounded and
sulking" Van Remsen "coiled like a spring ready to retaliate"
makes for a sufficiently scary scenario for future English name
proposals."