Proposal (1050) to South American Classification Committee
Modify classification
of the Ardeidae: (A) change the linear sequence and (B) add subfamilies
Note from Remsen: This is another proposal relayed from NACC,
which passed both parts. Note that much
of the background material is not directly relevant to SACC because our
baseline classification did not subdivide the Ardeidae into subfamilies or
tribes.
Background:
Our
current linear sequence of the family Ardeidae is unchanged since the seventh
edition of the Checklist (AOU 1998), where the notes for the family are as
follows:
“Recent studies of genetic and
vocal characters (Sheldon 1987[a], Sheldon et al. 1995, McCracken and Sheldon
1997) support the traditional arrangement used here in most ways; the
relationships of Butorides might be with the Nycticoracini rather than
the Ardeini.”
Curiously,
as might be deduced from this note, the family was divided into tribes rather
than subfamilies. Four tribes were recognized (genera in our area are in
parentheses):
1. Botaurini: Bitterns (Botaurus and Ixobrychus)
2. Tigrosomatini: Tiger-Herons (Tigrisoma)
3. Ardeini: Typical Herons (Ardea, Egretta,
Bubulcus, Butorides, Agamia, and Pilherodius), and
4. Nycticoracini: Night-Herons (Nycticorax,
Nyctanassa, and Cochlearius).
Numerous
molecular studies of herons have been published more recently than AOU (1998),
including Sheldon et al. (2000), Chang et al. (2003), and Huang et al. (2016),
but many questions remain concerning relationships among species and genera in
this family and higher-level divisions (subfamilies or tribes) within the
family. Kushlan and Hancock (2005), for example, divided the family into five
subfamilies:
1. Tigrisominae (tiger herons)
2. Botaurinae (bitterns)
3. Ardeinae (typical herons, including night
herons)
4. Agamiinae (Agami Heron Agamia agami),
and
5. Cochleariinae (Boat-billed Heron Cochlearius
cochlearius).
New
Information:
Hruska
et al. (2023) recently published a phylogenetic paper on herons based on
sequences of UCEs and mitochondrial DNA. They sampled 55 species of heron,
although success with both UCEs and mtDNA was variable: 46 species were
included in their UCE tree (Fig. 1), and 47 species in their mtDNA trees (Figs.
2, 3).
Fig. 1. Phylogenetic tree based on sequences of
UCEs (Hruska et al. 2023). All nodes received 100% bootstrap support except as
noted.
This
phylogeny recovered the subfamily structure of Kushlan and Hancock (2005),
although the species composition of subfamilies differed somewhat and the
subfamily name Tigriornithinae (Bock 1956) was used instead of Tigrisominae for
the tiger-herons. Support for relationships in the UCE tree was universally
high: all nodes received 100% bootstrap support with the exception of the node
uniting all species of the Ardeinae except for Gorsachius melanolophus,
which was 88%. The mitochondrial phylogenies (Maximum Likelihood and Bayesian)
recovered the same subfamily structure (except that Agamia agami was not
sampled, and so Agamiidae was not identified) and the same relationships among
subfamilies, although many bootstrap values were not as high, and the trees
lacked resolution in some areas:
Fig. 2. Phylogenetic tree based on Maximum
Likelihood analysis of sequences of mtDNA (Hruska et al. 2023). All nodes
received 100% bootstrap support except as noted.
Fig. 3. Phylogenetic tree based on Bayesian
analysis of sequences of mtDNA (Hruska et al. 2023). All nodes received 100%
bootstrap support except as noted.
Recommendation:
I
recommend that we adopt the linear classification posted at the end of this
proposal, as well as the following sub-family classification (to replace the
tribes used in AOU 1998):
1.
Tigriornithinae (tiger herons)
2.
Cochleariinae (Boat-billed Heron Cochlearius cochlearius)
3.
Agamiinae (Agami Heron Agamia agami)
4.
Botaurinae (bitterns)
5.
Ardeinae (typical herons, including night herons)
Note
that Tigriornithinae Bock, 1956, the subfamily name used by Hruska et al.
(2023), apparently has priority over Tigrisomatinae and Tigrisominae. The
latter names, as far as I’m aware, were first used by Payne & Risley (1976)
and Kushlan & Hancock (2005), respectively. (Thanks to David Donsker for
tracking down these references.)
Terry Chesser, May 2025
Note from Remsen on SACC voting structure:
A. A YES vote means you are in favor of changing
the SACC linear sequence. A NO vote
means you favor retaining the status quo or some other sequence (please
elaborate).
B. A YES vote means you are in favor of adding
the subfamily structure to the SACC list as per the NACC proposal.
Note also that the hyphens in “Night-Heron” are
removed automatically (as per our recently agreed-upon policy) because these
recent data indicate that they are not a monophyletic group, e.g. distantly
related Old World Gorsachius species also called “Night Heron”.
Note also that the sequence and classification
does not yet consider the current SACC proposal to place Bubulcus
in Ardea or a forthcoming proposal on the inclusion of Ixobrychus
in Botaurus.
Our current classification is as follows.
ARDEIDAE (HERONS) 1
Tigrisoma
lineatum Rufescent Tiger-Heron
Tigrisoma
fasciatum Fasciated Tiger-Heron
Tigrisoma
mexicanum Bare-throated Tiger-Heron
Agamia
agami Agami Heron
Cochlearius
cochlearius Boat-billed Heron
Zebrilus
undulatus Zigzag Heron
Botaurus
pinnatus Pinnated Bittern
Ixobrychus
exilis Least Bittern
Ixobrychus
involucris Stripe-backed Bittern
Nycticorax
nycticorax Black-crowned Night-Heron
Nyctanassa
violacea Yellow-crowned Night-Heron
Butorides
striata Striated Heron
Butorides
virescens Green Heron
Ardeola
ralloides Squacco Heron (V)
Bubulcus
ibis Cattle Egret
Ardea
cinerea Gray Heron (V)
Ardea
herodias Great Blue Heron
Ardea cocoi
Cocoi Heron
Ardea
purpurea Purple Heron (V)
Ardea alba Great
Egret
Syrigma
sibilatrix Whistling Heron
Pilherodius
pileatus Capped Heron
Egretta
tricolor Tricolored Heron
Egretta
rufescens Reddish Egret
Egretta
gularis Western Reef-Heron (V)
Egretta
garzetta Little Egret (V)
Egretta
thula Snowy Egret
Egretta
caerulea Little Blue Heron
If both A and B pass, then our new
classification would be as follows (following SACC’s standard
linear-sequencing conventions and using the UCE phylogeny above, Fig. 1):
ARDEIDAE (HERONS)
Tigriornithinae
Tigrisoma
lineatum Rufescent Tiger-Heron
Tigrisoma
mexicanum Bare-throated Tiger-Heron
Tigrisoma
fasciatum Fasciated Tiger-Heron
Cochleariinae
Cochlearius
cochlearius Boat-billed Heron
Agamiinae
Agamia
agami Agami Heron
Botaurinae
Zebrilus
undulatus Zigzag Heron
Ixobrychus
involucris Stripe-backed Bittern
Ixobrychus
exilis Least Bittern
Botaurus
pinnatus Pinnated Bittern
Ardeinae
Pilherodius
pileatus Capped Heron
Syrigma
sibilatrix Whistling Heron
Egretta
caerulea Little Blue Heron
Egretta
tricolor Tricolored Heron
Egretta
rufescens Reddish Egret
Egretta
thula Snowy Egret
Egretta
garzetta Little Egret (V)
Egretta
gularis Western Reef-Heron (V)
Nyctanassa
violacea Yellow-crowned Night Heron
Nycticorax
nycticorax Black-crowned Night Heron
Butorides
striata Striated Heron
Butorides
virescens Green Heron
Ardeola
ralloides Squacco Heron (V)
Bubulcus
ibis Cattle Egret
Ardea alba Great
Egret
Ardea
cinerea Gray Heron (V)
Ardea herodias
Great Blue Heron
Ardea cocoi
Cocoi Heron
Ardea purpurea
Purple Heron (V)
Voting Chart: https://www.museum.lsu.edu/~Remsen/SACCPropChart1044+.htm
Comments
from Bonaccorso:
“YES. The subfamilies and the sequences agree with the available evidence, both
nuclear and mitochondrial.”
Comments
from Remsen:
“A. YES. I re-checked
the NACC sequence and found no problems.
“B. YES. We don’t have a specific policy on when to
use subfamilies or a definition for “subfamily”. The category is widely used to demarcate deep
divisions within a group, and thus I find it useful when talking about that
group. So, if other people add
subfamilies to their classifications, I have no objection as long as that is
the intent.”