Proposal (287) to South American Classification Committee
Recognize
four species of Sporophila within the Sporophila americana superspecies
This proposal would change our current list in two respects: it
would place S. intermedia (Gray Seedeater) between S. corvina (Variable
Seedeater, previously called S. aurita) and S. americana (Wing-barred
Seedeater); and would recognize as a species distinct from the latter S.
murallae (Caquetá Seedeater). The detailed justification for this treatment
is presented in Stiles (1996); I summarize the main arguments here.
Classification of Sporophila seedeaters has in the past
largely been based upon the coloration of the adult males; in particular, among
the species of Central and northern South America, two main species groups have
been recognized with male plumage being mostly gray vs. black-and-white. In
this paper I argue that a close relationship exists between a black-and-white
species (corvina) and a gray species (intermedia), based upon
previously unappreciated similarities in plumage pattern, plumage sequences,
distribution, biometrics and two localized zones of at least sporadic
hybridization involving different races of both species. S. intermedia and
americana are apparently parapatric in coastal NE Venezuela and W Guyana
and appear to replace each other on Trinidad and Tobago, suggesting that they
are too similar ecologically to coexist. No hybrids are known between these two, and
they appear less closely related than intermedia is to corvina based
on plumage pattern. The range of americana
continues along the coastal lowlands of South America to the mouth of the
Amazon and thence eastward along the Amazon (and apparently one or more of its
northern tributaries in E Brazil) to the region of Manaus; Amazonian birds may
differ in plumage from those of the coastal regions and have been named as a
separate subspecies dispar, although this has not been accepted by all
authors. Separated from this population by ca. 500 km is murallae,
an isolated upper Amazonian derivative of americana. This form had been
considered intermediate between corvina and americana by Meyer de
Schauensee (1952), and some authors used this, notably Olson (1981) to lump corvina
with all its races into americana. I demonstrate that this
is incorrect, and that except for its lesser development of wing-bars there is
no justification for allying murallae with corvina; in numerous features
its affinities clearly lie with americana. However, it differs from americana
in several plumage characters (and more from the Amazonian populations of the
latter, if the characters of dispar are correct). It also differs
most strikingly in biometrics, such that I consider it less close to americana
than corvina is to intermedia, and thus deserving of species
rank. These four should be placed in the following order in our list: corvina,
intermedia, americana and murallae.
Considering all of these forms as a single superspecies appears
justified based on the overall distribution of all forms. At the center of the
distribution is intermedia, with the black-and-white forms occurring
around the periphery, generally in areas of higher rainfall (as might be
expected by Gloger's rule). No member of this group appears to occur on the
Guyana shield.
I note in passing that, as Olson had earlier suggested, the name aurita
is unidentifiable as its type came from the stable hybrid swarm between the
races corvina and hicksii. The type has disappeared, and it is
impossible to assign this name to either of the parental populations. The
oldest name in this group that clearly refers to a definite population is corvina;
hence the Variable Seedeater should be called S. corvina. (Olson did not
do this as he considered all the black-and-white forms to be races of americana).
I also note that Dickinson and Ridgely & Greenfield recognize murallae
as a species separate from americana. I recommend a YES vote on this proposal.
References:
Meyer de
Schauensee, R. 1952. A review of the genus Sporophila. Proc. Acad. Natl.
Sci. Phila. 104:153-196.
Olson, S.
L. 1981. The nature of variability in the Variable Seedeater of Panama. Proc.
Biol. Soc. Wash. 94:380-390.
Stiles, F.
G. 1996. When black plus white equals gray: the nature of variability in the
Variable Seedeater complex (Emberizidae: Sporophila). Orn. Neotrop.
7:75-107.
Gary
Stiles, June 2007
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Comments from Robbins: "YES for now in recognizing
four species within the Sporophila americana complex. I would like
to see a molecular data set, not only for this group but for all of Sporophila,
before I become fully convinced of species limits within this complex."
Comments from Zimmer: "YES. A confusing group to
be sure, but Gary's arguments are convincing."
Comments from Nores: "YES, aunque no muy convencido. Este es un caso en el cual un análisis molecular
sería fundamental. Además, Ridgely y Tudor señalan que las vocalizaciones de
todas las poblaciones son similares."
Comments from Jaramillo: "YES - Although I imagine
that eventually we may have some more re-shuffling in this genus. I concur with
others that this genus is screaming out for a molecular analysis."
Comments from Pacheco: "YES. Estou ciente das dificuldades do complexo Sporophila
americana; todavia, entendo que o arranjo proposto por Gary é melhor que o
tradicional."