Proposal (298) to South American
Classification Committee
Change English name
of Cnipodectes to Twistwing (II)
In
SACC Proposal no. 184 (which I posted in October
2005), a majority of SACC members voted in favour of changing the name of Cnipodectes
subbrunneus from Brownish Flycatcher to Brownish Twistwing (6-4).
However, due to SACC voting rules, the proposal was rejected as not achieving 7
votes. Interestingly, following committee member changes and the fact that
native Spanish or Portuguese speaking members no longer vote on English names,
if everyone who voted on the previous proposal and who still has a vote
maintains their vote on proposal 184, this one will now pass.
Committee
membership changes and gripes about the SACC voting system are not good reasons
for a new proposal to be considered. There are however important reasons to
reconsider this issue. First, a new Cnipodectes has been described
from Peru (Proposal 297). It would be sensible to
unite these two congeners under the English name "Twistwing", given
that the two species share similarly modified primaries. Secondly, despite
SACC's approach and a willingness on the part of the ornithological community
generally to follow its recommendations, several authors of key publications
have made a point of not following SACC on the English name
for Cnipodectes: (i) Restall et al. 2006 Birds of Northern South America
purported to use SACC recommendations for English names throughout but, without
drawing attention to the point, used "Twistwing" for Cnipodectes;
(ii) Salaman et al. 2007 Checklist of Birds of Colombia followed SACC taxonomy
and nomenclature on all but a short list of specified issues, including usage
of "Twistwing"; and (iii) the Auk allowed Lane et
al. (2007) to use "Twistwing" in assigning an English name for the
new Cnipodectes species, despite the AOU's own checklist
committee having rejected the name for the genus.
In
summary, SACC's decision in Proposal 184
was supported only by a minority of committee members; and other persons have
gone out of their way to avoid SACC's recommendation. Reasons of principle and
usage for changing the name for Cnipodectes were set out in
Proposal 184. The SACC use of "Flycatcher" is destabilising in the
face of widespread use of the name "Twistwing" and would create a
novel name for a recently described species, another avoidable negative outcome.
I recommend a yes vote, again.
Anonymous, August 2007
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Comments
from Remsen: "YES.
In spite of the numerous brilliant and cogent reasons I presented previously
for retaining the cherished and charismatic name Brownish Flycatcher for C.
subbrunneus, I recognize that the cutesy name Twistwing is here to stay.
Add to the list of traitorous capitulators: J. Fitzpatrick et al. in HBW, as
well as the devious and cunning Dan Lane, whose preferred name Rufous Twistwing
for C. superrufus leaves Rufous Flycatcher 'preoccupied' by Myiarchus
semirufus. Wounded and sulking, I remain coiled like a spring ready to
retaliate with a barrage of NO votes on subsequent proposals."
Comments
from Stiles:
"YES. I liked "Twistwing" before and I like it now!"
Comments
from Stotz:
"YES. I hate to vote for Twistwing, having voting against it in the past,
but I guess I don't see a clear alternative. The other option would be to create a new name
for the new species of Cnipodectes (the Lane et al Flycatcher or
the Status Quo Flycatcher?), which doesn't do much to maintain stability."
Comments
from Jaramillo:
"YES - I think Twistwing is an absolutely fantastic name. The issue of
Rufous Flycatcher being preoccupied also clarifies this choice."
Comments
from Robbins:
"YES. I favored "twistwing" the first go around. Perhaps we
should now revisit the English name for Neopipo, and get it right
this time by calling it Cinnamon Tyrant!"
Comments
from Zimmer:
"YES. I liked (and voted for) "Twistwing" the first time around
for subbrunneus, and nothing since has changed my mind. The
preoccupation of "Rufous Flycatcher" by Myiarchus semirufus provides
even further ammunition for this change. I congratulate "the devious and
cunning Dan Lane" for engineering this coup, although the image of a
"wounded and sulking" Van Remsen "coiled like a spring ready to
retaliate" makes for a sufficiently scary scenario for future English name
proposals."