Proposal
(323) to South American
Classification Committee
Recognize
the genus Tarphonomus for two "Upucerthia"
Effect on SACC: This would transfer two species from their
current placement in Upucerthia to Tarphonomus, the genus newly
described for them.
Background: SACC classification currently classifies
all the earthcreepers in their traditional genus, Upucerthia. Multiple
lines of evidence indicate that this genus is polyphyletic, with two of the
major "offenders" being harterti and certhioides. Our
current Note is as follows:
"7. The
genus Ochetorhynchus was used for U. harterti and U.
certhioides by Ridgely & Tudor (1994) to recognize the distinctiveness
of these two species from other Upucerthia (especially with respect to
nest type); however, the type species of Ochetorhynchus is ruficaudus,
making that name unavailable for harterti + certhioides unless
ruficaudus is also included (Remsen 2003). Peters (1951) treated
those three species in Ochetorhynchus. The genus Upucerthia is
highly polyphyletic (Chesser et al. 2007, Fjeldså et al. 2007), with (a) harterti
and certhioides in a group with Pseudocolaptes and Premnornis,
(b) andaecola and ruficaudus in a group with Eremobius
and Chilia, (c) serrana basal to a group that includes Cinclodes
and the remaining Upucerthia (dumetaria, albigula, jelskii,
and validirostris). Chesser and Brumfield (2007) named a new genus Tarphonomus for certhioides
+ harterti."
New information: As noted above, two independent
genetic data sets appeared in 2007, using different genes and samples, with the
same results, namely that Upucerthia consists of 4 different
groups of birds, and to keep that genus monophyletic would require merger of
virtually every furnariine genus into one. For example, Chesser et al. (2007)
found that the two Upucerthia that group with Eremobius and Chilia are
basal to all other furnariine genera sampled, including, for example, Synallaxis,
Philydor, Furnarius, and Cinclodes. With respect to this
proposal, harterti and certhioides formed a group (96% ML
bootstrap) with Pseudocolaptes, and true Upucerthia (dumetaria,
albigula, validirostris, jelskii) form a group (100% ML bootstrap) with Cinclodes.
Their sample was based on both nuclear and mitochondrial genes (total 1927 bp),
and separate analyses of mtDNA and nDNA produced similar results, as did all
methods of data analysis. Therefore, as suspected for decades (including even
by master-lumper Peters), harterti and certhioides (clearly
sisters) do not belong in Upucerthia.
Chesser and Brumfield (2007) named a new genus for these two
species after establishing that there was no other name available and
concluding correctly that no one in their right mind would merge these two into
the sister genus Pseudocolaptes.
If anyone needs pdfs of these papers, let me know (or download
them from Robb Brumfield's web page).
Analysis and Recommendation: In my opinion, there
is no reason to hesitate on this one. Anyone familiar with these birds knows
that the only thing that they shared with true Upucerthia was
terrestrial foraging and a relatively long bill. The genetic data leave beyond
a doubt that the genus Upucerthia grouped species that shared a
morphotype, and pruning in needed to make this genus monophyletic. This
proposal is a first step, and I recommend a YES, to recognize them under the
new genus name Tarphonomus and to transfer them to follow Pseudocolaptes in
our linear sequence.
References:
Chesser, R.
T., F. K. Barker, & R. T. Brumfield. 2007. Four-fold polyphyly of the genus
formerly known as Upucerthia, with notes on the systematics and
evolution of the avian subfamily Furnariinae, Molecular Phylogenetics and
Evolution 44:1320-1332.
Chesser, R.
T., & R. T. Brumfield. 2007. Tarphonomus, a new genus of ovenbird
(Aves: Passeriformes: Furnariidae) from South America. PROCEEDINGS OF THE
BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON
120(3): 337-339.
[See SACC Literature Cited for others]
Van Remsen
(in consultation with Robb Brumfield and Terry Chesser), December 2007
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Comments from Stiles: "YES. Again, the genetic
data clearly mandate this change, and the morphological data favoring placement
in Upucerthia were not particularly strong in the first
place."
Comments from Zimmer: "YES for reasons stated by
Van in the proposal."
Comments from Robbins: "YES. The Chesser et al.
genetic data support erecting a new genus, Tarphonomus for certhioides and
harterti."
Comments from Pacheco: "YES. A sugestão me parece plenamente convincente. Voto sim
pelo uso imediato do gênero recém proposto."
Comments from Nores: "YES. Siempre consideré que certhioides y harterti tenían poco
parecido con las verdaderas Upucerthia, pero tampoco me gustaba la idea
de ponerlas junto con ruficauda y andaecola para sepáralas de Upucerthia.
La creación del nuevo género para estas dos especies, apoyado por análisis
genético, resuelve perfectamente este problema."