Proposal (#379)
to South
American Classification Committee
Recognize Trogon chionurus as a separate species
from Trogon viridis (2)
Effect on SACC: This would treat an
existing species, Trogon viridis,
into two species.
Background: Our current SACC note is as
follows:
2. Ridgely & Greenfield (2001) considered the subspecies chionurus of the Chocó region to be a
separate species from Trogon viridis;
followed by Hilty (2003); SACC proposal to recognize this split did
not pass because of insufficient published data. Genetic data (DaCosta &
Klicka 2008) suggest that chionurus
is more closely related to T. bairdii
than either are to Amazonian T. viridis.
Proposal needed. Sibley & Monroe (1990) considered Trogon viridis to form a superspecies with Central American T. bairdii, and suggested that they
might be conspecific. Proposal needed.
See
SACC proposal 49
for a summary of previous arguments pro and con. A one-sentence summary of the previous
arguments might be although chionurus
differs from viridis in voice and
plumage, the vocal differences have not been adequately quantified or
documented (in fact, published descriptions are contradictory). You can here samples of both at Xeno-Canto –
I am impressed with the differences in rhythm: chionurus
and viridis (but
I also hear lots of variability – browse Trogon viridis.
New
information: DaCosta & Klicka (2008) published a gene-based
phylogeny of the genus that included samples of bairdii (2), viridis from
Amazonia (12), and chionurus from W.
Ecuador and Panama (2). They sampled 1
mitochondrial gene, ND2, and 1041 base pairs, of which 557 were phylogenetically
informative. They found strong support
(99% maximum likelihood bootstrap, 100% Bayesian support) for the sister
relationship between chionurus and bairdii, as well as strong support for
Amazonian viridis as the sister to
these two. See Prop. 378
for tree.
Analysis
and Recommendation: With genetic support from only a single,
mitochondrial gene as the basis for the relationship, one could argue that the
tree is only a gene tree, not a species tree, or that the bairdii-chionurus
relationship is due to incomplete lineage-sorting, or even that hybridization
between bairdii and chionurus produces the result. Nonetheless, combined with the qualitative
vocal data, I think that published evidence is sufficient for a change in
species limits, so I tentatively recommend a YES.
Literature
Cited:
DaCOSTA,
J. M., AND J. KLICKA. 2008. The Great American Interchange in birds: a
phylogenetic perspective with the genus Trogon.
Molecular Ecology 17: 1328-1343.
Note
on English names: Ridgely & Greenfield (2001) coined
“Western White-tailed Trogon” for chionurus
and “Amazonian White-tailed Trogon” for viridis,
and this was followed by Hilty (2003) and Gill & Wright (2006). I think that represents a degree of
establishment that justifies starting with them as “status quo” if the proposal
passes. However, Cory (1919) restricted
White-tailed to chionurus and called viridis “Green-backed.” These are actually very nice names. “Chionurus” means “snow-tailed”, and the
larger amount of white in the tail of chionurus
is one of the differences between the two taxa; and there is also the nice
parallel between the English and scientific names. “Green-backed” also points to another major
plumage difference between the two (blue back in chionurus) and is also reflected, somewhat, in the scientific name viridis.
Also, those long compound names are fairly unpopular, despite their
ability to imply relationships. And in
this case, with bairdii likely the
sister to chionurus, they are
actually misleading as to relationships.
Finally, “Western” and “Amazonian” are fairly insipid and not entirely
accurate because a highly disjunct population of viridis is found in the Atlantic Forest region. Therefore, I propose
we use these shorter, more accurate, more venerable names as the status quo
(therefore requiring a proposal the longer compound names could be instituted
by proposal), but I’d like to take a poll of our English-first members to see
if they like this.
Additional
Note on English names (added 6 May 09): Frank Gill pointed out to me that the
illustrations in Ridgely & Gwynne (1989), Ridgely & Greenfield (2001),
and HBW show chionurus as having a
bright green back. This is evidently an
error. Our recent specimens from Panama
have unambiguously violet-blue backs, as illustrated correctly by Restall et
al. (2006). Wetmore (1968) indicated
that some individuals may have green in the center of the back, but I cannot
find any evidence for all-green backs.
Van Remsen,
November 2008
Comments from Zimmer: “YES. Vocal distinctions between these two have
been noted for some time, and there are plenty of qualitative descriptions out
there, as well as published and internet-searchable examples of recordings. These agree well with the DaCosta &
Klicka genetic data, which places chionurus
as closer to bairdii, a relationship
that would have been predicted on vocal and morphological characters
alone. I think Van’s suggestions
regarding English names (“White-tailed” reserved for chionurus, and “Green-backed” for viridis) are excellent.”
Comments
from Robbins: “YES, again web-based vocal data support the
Klicka et al. genetic conclusions. I fully support Van’s English name
suggestions.”
Comments
from Stiles: “YES, for reasons stated by Van and
Kevin. I also prefer the English names
suggested by Van – I dislike three-word monsters, hyphenated or not, if simpler
alternatives are available.”
Comments
from Nores: “YES. Los datos morfológicos, genéticos y de vocalizaciones
indican que chionurus es una especie
diferente de T. viridis. Sin embargo,
me parece poco probable que esté más cerca de T. bairdii que de T. viridis.
Pienso que debe tratarse de un problema relacionado con haber usado un solo gen
mitocondrial, como ha sido destacado por Van. Como en Xeno-Canto no hay
vocalizaciones de T. bairdii no pude
comparar con las otras especies.”
Comments
from Stotz: “YES. I favor Van's English names.”
Comments
from Jaramillo: “YES – Song, morphology and genetics all line
up to clarify the relationship here. Kudos to Van for suggesting some simple
names, rather than multi-word monsters, so yes Green-backed and White-tailed
work well!
Comments
from Pacheco: "YES.
Os dados disponíveis
bem corroboram a proposta.”