Recognize a new scientific name for the Blue-winged Warbler
Proposal (454) to South American
Classification Committee
NOTE: The following proposal was
submitted to and passed NACC, and is here submitted with the authors’
permission.
Olson and Reveal (2009) have shown that the Linnaean name Certhia pinus is a composite name, based
on illustrations of birds of two different warbler species, the Pine Warbler,
now known as Dendroica pinus,
illustrated by Catesby, and the Blue-winged Warbler, now Vermivora pinus, illustrated by Edwards.
Wilson was aware of the problem and essentially restricted the name to
what we now call the Pine Warbler.
He, and later Bonaparte, in effect lectotypified Certhia pinus as Catesby’s plate. Wilson described as new the Blue-winged Warbler, as Sylvia solitaria. Wilson used the name pinus for the Pine Warbler.
Baird (1858), however, used pinus
of Linnaeus for the Blue-winged Warbler, and gave Wilson credit for the name Sylvia (now Dendroica) pinus,
incorrectly regarding Wilson’s use of that name as a new name. Stejneger (1885) realized the latter
was wrong and used the name Sylvia
vigorsii for the Pine Warbler.
Stone (1921) argued again that Wilson was giving a name to Catesby’s
illustration as pinus, and that name,
attributed to Wilson, has been used by AOU since 1931. But Wilson was merely mentioning the
name as used by Latham. Even if he
intended it as new it would have been a junior homonym, and thus unavailable.
Wilson’s and Bonaparte’s actions clearly made Linnaeus’s name Certhia pinus the name for the Pine
Warbler, and thus Wilson’s Sylvia
solitaria is the name for the Blue-winged Warbler. Unfortunately, that name is preoccupied
by Sylvia solitaria Lewin, 1808, and
no other name is available. Olson
and Reveal proposed the name Vermivora
cyanoptera.
I propose that we accept this new name and the other consequences of
this study. The Blue-winged
Warbler and its citation must be listed as:
Vermivora cyanoptera Olson and
Reveal. Blue-winged Warbler
Literature
Olson, S.
L., and J. L. Reveal. 2009. Nomenclatural history and a new name
for the Blue-winged Warbler (Aves: Parulidae). Wilson Journal of Ornithology 121:618-620.
Richard C.
Banks, August 2010
=========================================================
Comments from Zimmer: “YES.
This seems to be a reasonable way out of this convoluted mess.”
Comments from Stiles: “YES – at
least tentatively. My only question is, is Levin’s solitaria currently a member of Sylvia
(or at least, anything but Vermivora?) If so, would this not make Wilson’s
name solitaria available for the
Blue-winged Warbler?”
Comments from Nores: “NO. When Wilson (1810) described Sylvia solitaria, the name was invalid
because Silvia solitaria had been
used previously by Lewin in 1808 (at present Origma solitaria). However, as the species
passed to genus Vermivora, there are
no species with the name Vermivora
solitaria. For this reason, the name solitaria
became valid. Although the name
has not been used since 1899, it seems preferable to resurrect an old name than
to create a new one.”
Comments from
Pacheco: “YES. I consider
the proposal consistent with the nomenclatural situation. It is irrelevant to
know which genus is currently the name involved in this type of homonymy. In a case of primary homonymy, Sylvia
solitaria Wilson, 1810 (pre-occupied by Sylvia solitaria Lewin, 1808) - being the youngest - is considered
permanently invalid in accordance with the Code. Article
57.2 of the ICZN is clear about this: “Primary homonyms. Identical
species-group names established for different nominal taxa when originally
combined with the same generic name are primary homonyms and the junior name is
permanently invalid.”
Comments from Pérez: “YES. This is a
particularly confusing nomenclatural history, but Fernando’s comments added an
important clarifying note to validate the use of Vermivora cyanoptera.”