Proposal (517) to South American Classification Committee
Establish English names for Sporophila bouvreuil and Sporophila
pileata
Background
With the passage of Proposal #502, Sporophila
pileata is now considered a distinct species from S. bouvreuil. In all recent literature, the species is known as the
Capped Seedeater, although now both putative species share the distinctive
black cap, meaning that novel names or historical names must be used, as
discussed below.
Analysis of names (suggested by Rob Clay, Alvaro
Jaramillo and Arne Lesterhuis [1 & 2], Mark Pearman and Nacho Areta [3
& 4]; one of the historical names by Hellmayr)
1)
Distribution-based:
Southern Capped (pileata) vs. Northern Capped (bouvreuil)
Pros- Indicates the genetic
relationship between the two taxonomic groups, and recalls the previously named
Capped Seedeater.
Cons- They are not the only seedeaters
with a cap; nigrorufa also has a black
cap, cinnamomea has a grey cap. They
are not the northernmost or southernmost Sporophila
species; instead one just occurs to the north, or essentially to the north and
east of the other. These names are also long and cumbersome.
2)
Cap/pileum-based:
Pileated (pileata) vs. Capped (bouvreuil)
Pros- Pileated reflects the scientific
name of pileata, and Capped retains
the current name of bouvreuil.
Cons- The two names have the same
meaning, and there are other Sporophila
species with a cap (see above). The names miss the opportunity to give more
information.
3)
Color-based:
Pearly-bellied (pileata) and Copper (bouvreuil)
Pros- The names
align with those of other Sporophila
using colors, which is traditional in the genus. We tried to make them as
accurate and memorable as possible by not using simple color names. “bellied”
could have been replaced by breasted, but bellied generally implies that the
entire underparts are of that color. There was no need to use a modifier for bouvreuil because it is almost entirely
copper-colored.
Cons- Nothing in
particular. Note that Hellmayr (1938) used Pinkish Seedeater for S. bouvreuil, but that this species is
not pinkish at all.
4)
Taxonomist-based:
Natterer’s (pileata) and Müller’s (bouvreuil)
Pros- Hellmayr (1938) used Natterer’s
Seedeater for pileata because it was discovered by Natterer (among
several astonishing discoveries) and described by Sclater (1864), who
acknowledged Natterer’s contribution even in the title of his paper. By the
same token, Müller’s Seedeater can be applied to bouvreuil, because he
was the first one to attach a name to the species.
Cons- Color-based names would be more
useful in the field.
Recommendation
We recommend a YES vote to use
Pearly-bellied Seedeater Sporophila
pileata, and Copper Seedeater Sporophila
bouvreuil.
Literature
HELLMAYR CE (1938) Catalogue of Birds of the
Americas and adjacent islands. Part XI. Field Museum of Natural History
Publications 430, Zoology Series, Vol. XIII.
SCLATER PL (1864) Descriptions of seven new
species of birds discovered by the late Dr. John Natterer in Brazil. Proceedings
of the Scientific Meetings of the Zoological Society of London: 605–611.
Nacho
Areta and Mark Pearman, February 2012
Note from Remsen: A YES vote endorses Nacho and Mark’s
recommendation (Pearly-bellied and Copper), whereas a NO vote indicates
preference of one of the other options above.
Comments from Jaramillo:
“YES. Pearly-bellied and
Copper sound great, unique and they are helpful in the field!”
Comments from Stotz: “YES, not so much because I am dazzled by the accuracy and beauty
of those names, but more in the spirit of the approaching election season, as
the least of the evils. Northern vs. Southern Capped would be more
attractive if these were fairly distinct species not closely related to all the
other little Sporophila and if you
really wanted to set them apart from the other Sporophila. Would we hyphenate these names Southern
Capped-Seedeater and Northern Capped-Seedeater as a monophyletic unit? I don't
like Pileated and Capped in large part because I think when we split a
widespread species, in general we should be coin a new name for the remnant
unless the split is very lopsided (split of Hispaniolan Crossbill from
White-winged for example) or the old common name goes with the different
scientific name (Winter Wren is an example of that). I am not generally in favor of English names
being patronyms, so don't like Natterer's and Muller's Seedeaters. If we
vote No on this, I would probably go for Natterer's and Muller's, but would be
open to arguments for Pileated and Capped.”
Comments from Zimmer:
“YES and NO. Sorry to muck this up, but
I would vote “YES” in making pileata
the “Pearly-bellied Seedeater”, but would prefer “Cinnamon Seedeater” over
“Copper Seedeater” for bouvreuil. I think “Cinnamon” is a much more accurate
description of the color of this bird.
To me, “Copper” implies a much darker, more saturated color, more along
the lines of Sporophila cinnamomea,
which carries the English name of “Chestnut Seedeater”. If you go to the Brazilian website WikiAves
and search under Sporophila bouvreuil,
you will find more than 20 pages of photos of bouvreuil and pileata,
and I would argue that there is not a single example of a bird that even
approaches the color of copper. Now, it
is unfortunate that the species epithet of Chestnut Seedeater is cinnamomea, and some would probably
argue that we shouldn’t have an English name of “Cinnamon Seedeater” for a
species other than S. cinnamomea. I don’t personally think that is a major
problem, but if it is, then I would favor “Tawny” or even “Buffy” as a modifier
over “Copper”. I do think that these
descriptive names are better than going with “Northern Capped” and “Southern
Capped”, “Capped” and “Pileated”, or the proposed patronyms, for reasons
already elaborated in the proposal and by other committee members.”
Additional
comments from Pearman: “Both Copper Seedeater and Coppery Seedeater would be grammatically
correct, i.e. as an adjective (as mentioned by Gary) or as a noun to mean the
copper color; see http://www.audioenglish.net/dictionary/copper.htm or any online dictionary.
“Usage in other bird
names is fairly even e.g. Coppery Emerald, Coppery Metaltail, Coppery Thorntail
vs. Copper Sunbird and Copper Pheasant.
There may be others that I couldn't recall or find, and there are of
course numerous hyphenated names using bother Copper and Coppery, which is
irrelevant.
“Using Coppery would mean
an extra syllable.
“I say keep it concise
and simple with Copper Seedeater, unless there is some specific reason or
something that can be gained by using Coppery.”
Additional comments from Areta:
“I agree with Mark's
arguments. The problem with other 'rusty' names is that they have been used
either in general or in other species of Sporophila and would represent
a wicked use of the same color names for differently colored birds (e.g.,
Buffy-fronted Seedeater, Tawny-bellied, etc.). Using Tawny Seedeater will cause
confusion with the 'uruguaya' form of S. hypoxantha. Rufous seedeater sounds like a misnomer (I
wouldn't call this bird rufous).
Cinnamon would cause confusion with cinnamomea, as already
pointed out by Mark and Kevin, was it not for this reason, I may be supportive
of using this name, but having a Cinnamon Seedeater for a Sporophila other
than cinnamomea seems odd. I do
not agree in that copper indicates a dark color (i.e., similar to chestnut) in
comparison to cinnamon. I think Copper is the best available option, given the
historical constraints that one must face when dealing with stability of
names.”
Additional
comments from Pearman: “I understand that the situation with S. bouvreuil (“Copper
Seedeater”) is different since it has been questioned more than once. From my
point of view, Copper Seedeater (a name actually coined by Nacho who has
studied more than a few Sporophila) is still a valuable name. Without
going down the road of writing another proposal, which I think someone else
could now write, if needed, my main points would be:
“1. Cinnamon Seedeater
could be easily confused with Sporophila cinnamomea and I suspect that
its usage would create instability and confusion.
“2. Copper Seedeater
(if not Coppery Seedeater as suggested by Gary Stiles) does closely approach
the main coloration of the bird and, most importantly, is a memorable and
evocative name, whereas cinnamon, chestnut, tawny, rufous have been used
countless times in bird names and have become mundane. The main theme of these
novel names was to be accurate but also memorable at the same time.”