Proposal (517) to South
American Classification Committee
Establish
English names for Sporophila bouvreuil
and Sporophila pileata
Background
With the
passage of Proposal #502, Sporophila
pileata is now considered a distinct species from S. bouvreuil. In all recent literature, the species is known as the
Capped Seedeater, although now both putative species share the distinctive
black cap, meaning that novel names or historical names must be used, as
discussed below.
Analysis of names
(suggested by Rob Clay, Alvaro Jaramillo and Arne Lesterhuis [1 & 2], Mark
Pearman and Nacho Areta [3 & 4]; one of the historical names by Hellmayr)
1) Distribution-based:
Southern Capped (pileata) vs. Northern Capped (bouvreuil)
Pros-
Indicates the genetic relationship between the two taxonomic groups, and
recalls the previously named Capped Seedeater.
Cons- They
are not the only seedeaters with a cap; nigrorufa
also has a black cap, cinnamomea has
a grey cap. They are not the northernmost or southernmost Sporophila species; instead one just occurs to the north, or
essentially to the north and east of the other. These names are also long and
cumbersome.
2) Cap/pileum-based:
Pileated (pileata) vs. Capped (bouvreuil)
Pros-
Pileated reflects the scientific name of pileata,
and Capped retains the current name of bouvreuil.
Cons- The
two names have the same meaning, and there are other Sporophila species with a cap (see above). The names miss the
opportunity to give more information.
3) Color-based:
Pearly-bellied (pileata) and Copper (bouvreuil)
Pros- The names align with those of other Sporophila using colors, which is traditional in the genus. We
tried to make them as accurate and memorable as possible by not using simple
color names. “bellied” could have been replaced by breasted, but bellied
generally implies that the entire underparts are of that color. There was no
need to use a modifier for bouvreuil
because it is almost entirely copper-colored.
Cons- Nothing in particular. Note that Hellmayr (1938) used Pinkish
Seedeater for S. bouvreuil, but that
this species is not pinkish at all.
4) Taxonomist-based:
Natterer’s (pileata) and Müller’s (bouvreuil)
Pros-
Hellmayr (1938) used Natterer’s Seedeater for pileata because it was
discovered by Natterer (among several astonishing discoveries) and described by
Sclater (1864), who acknowledged Natterer’s contribution even in the title of
his paper. By the same token, Müller’s Seedeater can be applied to bouvreuil,
because he was the first one to attach a name to the species.
Cons-
Color-based names would be more useful in the field.
Recommendation
We
recommend a YES vote to use Pearly-bellied Seedeater Sporophila pileata, and Copper Seedeater Sporophila bouvreuil.
Literature
HELLMAYR CE (1938) Catalogue of Birds of
the Americas and adjacent islands. Part XI. Field Museum of Natural History
Publications 430, Zoology Series, Vol. XIII.
SCLATER PL (1864) Descriptions of seven
new species of birds discovered by the late Dr. John Natterer in Brazil. Proceedings
of the Scientific Meetings of the Zoological Society of London: 605–611.
Nacho Areta and Mark Pearman, February 2012
Note from
Remsen: A YES vote endorses Nacho and Mark’s recommendation
(Pearly-bellied and Copper), whereas a NO vote indicates preference of one of
the other options above.
Comments from
Jaramillo: “YES Pearly-bellied and Copper sound great, unique and they are
helpful in the field!”
Comments from Stotz: “YES, not so much because I am dazzled by the accuracy and beauty
of those names, but more in the spirit of the approaching election season, as
the least of the evils. Northern vs. Southern Capped would be more
attractive if these were fairly distinct species not closely related to all the
other little Sporophila and if you
really wanted to set them apart from the other Sporophila. Would we hyphenate these names Southern
Capped-Seedeater and Northern Capped-Seedeater as a monophyletic unit? I
don't like Pileated and Capped in large part because I think when we split a
widespread species, in general we should be coin a new name for the remnant
unless the split is very lopsided (split of Hispaniolan Crossbill from
White-winged for example) or the old common name goes with the different
scientific name (Winter Wren is an example of that). I am not generally in favor of English names being
patronyms, so don't like Natterer's and Muller's Seedeaters. If we vote
No on this, I would probably go for Natterer's and Muller's, but would be open
to arguments for Pileated and Capped.”
Comments from
Zimmer: “YES and
NO. Sorry to muck this up, but I
would vote “YES” in making pileata
the “Pearly-bellied Seedeater”, but would prefer “Cinnamon Seedeater” over
“Copper Seedeater” for bouvreuil. I think “Cinnamon” is a much more
accurate description of the color of this bird. To me, “Copper” implies a much darker, more saturated color,
more along the lines of Sporophila
cinnamomea, which carries the English name of “Chestnut Seedeater”. If you go to the Brazilian website
WikiAves and search under Sporophila
bouvreuil, you will find more than 20 pages of photos of bouvreuil and pileata, and I would argue that there is not a single example of a
bird that even approaches the color of copper. Now, it is unfortunate that the species epithet of Chestnut
Seedeater is cinnamomea, and some
would probably argue that we shouldn’t have an English name of “Cinnamon
Seedeater” for a species other than S.
cinnamomea. I don’t personally
think that is a major problem, but if it is, then I would favor “Tawny” or even
“Buffy” as a modifier over “Copper”.
I do think that these descriptive names are better than going with
“Northern Capped” and “Southern Capped”, “Capped” and “Pileated”, or the
proposed patronyms, for reasons already elaborated in the proposal and by other
committee members.”
Additional comments from
Pearman: “Both Copper Seedeater and Coppery Seedeater would be grammatically
correct, i.e. as an adjective (as mentioned by Gary) or as a noun to mean the
copper color; see http://www.audioenglish.net/dictionary/copper.htm or any online dictionary.
“Usage in other bird
names is fairly even e.g. Coppery Emerald, Coppery Metaltail, Coppery Thorntail
vs. Copper Sunbird and Copper Pheasant.
There may be others that I couldn't recall or find, and there are of
course numerous hyphenated names using bother Copper and Coppery, which is
irrelevant.
“Using Coppery would mean
an extra syllable.
“I say keep it concise
and simple with Copper Seedeater, unless there is some specific reason or
something that can be gained by using Coppery.”
Additional comments
from Areta: “I agree with Mark's arguments. The problem with other 'rusty' names
is that they have been used either in general or in other species of Sporophila
and would represent a wicked use of the same color names for differently
colored birds (e.g., Buffy-fronted Seedeater, Tawny-bellied, etc.). Using Tawny
Seedeater will cause confusion with the 'uruguaya' form of S. hypoxantha. Rufous seedeater sounds like a misnomer
(I wouldn't call this bird rufous).
Cinnamon would cause confusion with cinnamomea, as already
pointed out by Mark and Kevin, was it not for this reason, I may be supportive
of using this name, but having a Cinnamon Seedeater for a Sporophila other
than cinnamomea seems odd.
I do not agree in that copper indicates a dark color (i.e., similar to
chestnut) in comparison to cinnamon. I think Copper is the best available
option, given the historical constraints that one must face when dealing with
stability of names.”
Additional comments from
Pearman: “I
understand that the situation with S. bouvreuil (“Copper Seedeater”) is
different since it has been questioned more than once. From my point of view,
Copper Seedeater (a name actually coined by Nacho who has studied more than a
few Sporophila) is still a valuable name. Without going down the road of
writing another proposal, which I think someone else could now write, if needed,
my main points would be:
“1. Cinnamon
Seedeater could be easily confused with Sporophila cinnamomea and I
suspect that its usage would create instability and confusion.
“2. Copper
Seedeater (if not Coppery Seedeater as suggested by Gary Stiles) does closely
approach the main coloration of the bird and, most importantly, is a memorable
and evocative name, whereas cinnamon, chestnut, tawny, rufous have been used
countless times in bird names and have become mundane. The main theme of these
novel names was to be accurate but also memorable at the same time.”