Proposal (518) to South
American Classification Committee
Recognize
the genus Isleria for two "Myrmotherula"
Effect on SACC: This
would transfer two species from their current placement in Myrmotherula
to Isleria, the genus newly described for them.
Background: SACC
currently classifies 27 species in the genus Myrmotherula. The
traditional plumage-based taxonomy of the genus was considered problematic by
earlier authors (i.e. Cory & Hellmayr, 1924; Peters 1951), and several
subsequent studies indicated that Myrmotherula is polyphyletic (Hackett
& Rosenberg, 1990; Irestedt, et al., 2004; Brumfield et al., 2007). Myrmotherula hauxwelli was
shown to be a distant relative of other members in the genus (Gómez et al.,
2010), and morphological, ecological, and behavioral differences support its
close relationship with M. guttata (reviewed by Zimmer and Isler, 2003).
However, the phylogenetic position of these two species has remained unknown.
New information: Results
from a subset of taxa from a densely sampled molecular phylogeny of the
Thamnophilidae (including 214 of 220 species) confirmed that Myrmotherula
guttata and M. hauxwelli are only distantly related to other species
in Myrmotherula, including its type species M. brachyura, and
showed that they are sister to the genus Thamnomanes (Bravo et al.,
2012). Because levels of phenotypic, ecological, and behavioral divergence
between guttata-hauxwelli and Thamnomanes do not warrant merging these
species into a larger genus Thamnomanes, the genus Isleria was
described for I. guttata and I. hauxwelli (see Bravo et al.,
2012).
Recommendation: We recommend a “YES” vote to recognize the recently described
genus Isleria for “Myrmotherula” guttata and hauxwelli.
References:
BRAVO, G. A., R. T.
CHESSER, & R. T. BRUMFIELD. 2012. Isleria,
a new genus of antwren (Aves: Passeriformes: Thamnophilidae). Zootaxa 3195: 61-67.
GÓMEZ, J. P., BRAVO,
G. A., BRUMFIELD, R. T., TELLO, J. G. & CADENA, C. D. 2010. A phylogenetic approach to disentangling the role of
competition and habitat filtering in community assembly of Neotropical forest
birds. Journal of Animal Ecology
79: 1181–1192.
[Other references in
SACC Literature]
Gustavo A. Bravo and
Robb T. Brumfield, February 2012
Comments from
Remsen: “YES. Having gone over
the data and informally reviewed the paper, the phylogeny requires removal of
these two species from Myrmotherula. Expansion of Thamnomanes to include them would violate the morphological and
behavioral themes of the members of that genus. Naming a new genus is the logical solution.”
Comments from Stiles: “YES; the split is well documented and the name Isleria is certainly a fitting
recognition of the Islers' contributions to antbird taxonomy.”
Comments from Robbins:
“YES. This seems the most reasonable course of action. Nice choice in generic name to
recognize the Islers’ many contributions to antbird relationships.”
Comments from Zimmer: “YES”.
The molecular data clearly dictates that guttata and hauxwelli be
removed from Myrmotherula. Although sister to Thamnomanes, guttata and hauxwelli are very different beasts
morphologically, vocally, and ecologically. Erection of a new genus is by far the best way to deal with
this, and the authors have picked a most appropriate name given the many
contributions made by the Islers to our knowledge of the Thamnophilidae.”
Comments from Nores: “YES. The molecular analysis by Bravo et al. (2012)
shows clearly that Myrmotherula guttata and
M. hauxwelli are not related to the true
Myrmotherula and Epinecrophylla, and
consequently the erection of a new genus is well justified. The other option in putting them into Thamnomanes seems less appropriate, but this would violate the
morphological and behavioral characteristics of the members of that genus.”
Comments from Pacheco: “YES. Uma justa homenagem aos Islers a partir de um split robustamente demonstrado.”
Comments from Jaramillo: “YES. This
is the reasonable course of action to take in order to maintain monophyletic
genera, and genera that are not exceedingly broad.”