Proposal
(680) to South American Classification Committee
Revise the linear sequence of cuckoos
(Cuculidae)
Background: Cuckoos are
geographically widespread and are highly diverse in size, morphology, and in
life history (most notably in reproductive biology). For reviews of the
classification of cuckoos, see Sibley and Ahlquist 1990 and Sorenson and Payne
2005. Although cuckoos are monophyletic, this diversity has been expressed
taxonomically in recent years by classifying cuckoos in a diversity of families
(Sibley and Ahlquist 1990, Sibley and Monroe 1990) or subfamilies (Sorenson and
Payne 2005, Dickinson and Remsen 2013). The AOU (AOU 1998, current SACC
classification) recognizes three subfamilies of New World cuckoos, which are
listed in the sequence:
Cuculinae
Coccycua
Piaya
Coccyzus
Neomorphinae
Tapera
Dromococcyx
Neomorphus
Crotophaginae
Crotophaga
Guira
I
don't know the historical basis for this sequence. The sequence adopted in the
20th century varied somewhat from author to author, but a common
pattern was listing the genera Coccyzus
(including Saurothera), Coccycua, and Piaya before the neomorphine and crotophagine genera, consistent
with the current SACC arrangement (e.g., Ridgway 1916, Cory 1919, Peters 1940,
Meyer de Schauensee 1966).
New information: Sorenson and Payne
(2005) provided the most comprehensive phylogenetic survey of cuckoos, based on
DNA sequence data from 202 individuals of 140 species. They resolved the
crotophagine taxa (Guira, Crotophaga)
as sister to the neomorphine taxa (Tapera,
Dromococcyx, Morococcyx, Geococcyx, and Neomorphus);
and collectively Crotophaginae + Neomorphinae are sister to all other cuckoos.
The Sorenson and Payne phylogeny of cuckoos is remarkably complete, but is
based entirely on mitochondrial DNA.
More
recent phylogenetic studies provide independent support, however, for the
outlines of the Sorenson and Payne phylogeny. Hackett et al. (2008), in a broad
survey of the avian radiation using 32 kb of DNA sequence data from 19 nuclear
genes, sampled seven genera of cuckoos. Consistent with Sorenson and Payne,
Hackett et al. recovered Crotophaga
as sister to Geococcyx, and these two
as sister to all other cuckoos. Using a slightly more expansive data set,
Burleigh et al. (2015) reported the same result.\
Therefore,
the basal node in Cuculidae is that separating Crotophaginae + Neomorphinae
from all other cuckoos. Using the standard conventions for translating a
branching phylogeny into a linear sequence (i.e., that the branch that includes
the smaller number of taxa is listed first), and considered the global patterns
of cuckoo diversity, then these two subfamilies should be listed first, not
last. Using the same rationale, Crotophaginae should be listed before
Neomorphinae; and within Crotophaginae, Guira
should be listed before Crotophaga.
The
resulting revised linear sequence of cuckoos would be:
Crotophaginae
Guira
Crotophaga
Neomorphinae
Tapera
Dromococcyx
Neomorphus
Cuculinae
Coccycua
Piaya
Coccyzus
Recommendation: SACC should adopt the
revised sequence, to better reflect the available evidence for the phylogeny of
cuckoos.
Literature
Cited:
American
Ornithologists' Union. 1998. Check-list of North American birds. Seventh
edition. American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C.
Burleigh, J.G., R.T.
Kimball, and E.L. Braun. 2015. Building the avian tree of life using a
large-scale, sparse supermatrix. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 84:
53-63.
Cory, C.B. 1919. Catalogue
of birds of the Americas. Part II, number 2. Field Museum of Natural
History Zoological Series volume 13, part 2, number 2.
Dickinson,
E.C., and J.V. Remsen, Jr. (editors). 2013. The Howard
and Moore complete checklist of the birds of the world. Fourth edition. Volume
1. Non-passerines. Aves Press, Eastbourne, United Kingdom.
Hackett, S.J., R.T.
Kimball, S. Reddy, R.C.K. Bowie, E.L. Braun, M.J. Braun, J.L. Chojnowski, W.A.
Cox, K.-L. Han, J. Harshman, C.J. Huddleston, B.D. Marks, K.J. Miglia, W.S.
Moore, F.H. Sheldon, D.W. Steadman, C.C. Witt, and T. Yuri. 2008. A
phylogenomic study of birds reveals their evolutionary history. Science 320:
1763-1768.
Meyer
de Schauensee, R. 1966. The species of birds of South America and their
distribution. Livingston Publishing
Company, Narberth, Pennsylvania.
Peters, J.L. 1940. Check-list
of birds of the world. Volume IV. Harvard University Press,
Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Ridgway, R. 1916. The
birds of North and Middle America. Part VII. Bulletin of the United
States National Museum 50, part 7.
Sibley, C.G., and J.E.
Ahlquist. 1990. Phylogeny and classification of birds: a study in molecular
evolution. Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut.
Sibley,
C.G., and B.L. Monroe, Jr. 1990. Distribution and taxonomy of birds of the
world. Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut.
Sorenson,
M.D., and R.B. Payne. 2005. A molecular genetic analysis of cuckoo phylogeny.
Pages 68-94 in R.B. Payne, The cuckoos. Oxford University Press, New York, New
York, and Oxford, United Kingdom.
Tom Schulenberg, September 2015
=========================================================
Comments
from Remsen: “YES. Genetic data solid, and linear sequence
conforms to conventions.”
Comments
from Pacheco: “YES. In
short, there is now a sequence supported by different data sets.”
Comments from Stiles: “YES, to be consistent with the genetic data for the
cuckoos.”
Comments
from Jaramillo: “YES –
Data are solid; they correlate with behavior and morphology of the birds;
nothing odd or surprising here.”
Comments
from Stotz: “YES
grudgingly. I recognize that this
follows our convention, but nothing has been moved, the relationships we
recognize are unchanged, but we flip the sequence that has been used for
decades. Is there are any new
information in this new sequence? Not as
far as I can tell.”
Comments from Zimmer: “YES, for reasons already quoted in the proposal.”
Comments from Robbins: “YES, but I fully
concur with Doug’s comments!”