Proposal (828) to South American
Classification Committee
Revise classification
of Claravinae: (A) transfer Claravis
geoffroyi and C. mondetoura to Paraclaravis, and B) modify linear sequence of genera
Background: The proposal below by
Nick Mason (included here with his permission) was submitted to the North
American Classification Committee and was passed: http://checklist.aou.org/assets/proposals/PDF/2019-C.pdf. The change will be in the 60th Supplement ---
Chesser at al., in press.
If anyone
needs a pdf of Sangster et al. (2018), let me know. Their key figure is pasted in here, which
shows that inclusion of mondetoura
and geoffroyi makes Claravis paraphyletic; however, the
support for the tree topology is substandard:
As
acknowledged by Sangster et al. (2018), stronger support comes from Sweet et
al. (2017); their key figure is pasted in here:
This is a
follow-up proposal for SACC, modified only to include the type species for the
genus, geoffroyi, and to modify the
linear sequence of genera according to reflect the phylogeny of Sweet et al.
(2017), divided into 2 parts:
A.
Transfer Claravis geoffroyi and C. mondetoura
to Paraclaravis.
B. Revise
the linear sequence of genera as follows, using our ladderization convention:
Claravis
Uropelia
Paraclaravis
Metriopelia
Columbina
Recommendation: YES to both; data
seem solid.
Van Remsen, May 2019
Original
NACC proposal by Nick Mason:
Transfer
Maroon-chested Ground-Dove Claravis mondetoura to new genus
Paraclaravis
Effect on NACC:
This proposal
would revise the generic placement of one species in the family Columbidae.
Specifically, Claravis mondetoura would be transferred to the new genus
Paraclaravis.
Background and New
Information:
A
recent molecular phylogenetic study of the columbid subfamily Claravinae
revealed the genus Claravis to be
polyphyletic (Fig. 1). Sangster et
al. (2018) estimated a mitochondrial phylogeny based on ND2, cyt b, COI, and ATP8 as well as a nuclear
phylogeny based on beta-fibrinogen intron 7 (FIB7). Their analyses revealed
that Claravis mondetoura and C. geoffroyi form a clade
phylogenetically distinct from other genera in the subfamily (also see Sweet et
al. 2017), but that this clade is not sister to the type species of Claravis, C. pretiosa. Maintaining these three species in Claravis would necessitate a merger of
three other genera (Columbina, Metriopelia, and Uropelia) with Claravis (Fig.
1), a lump that would contradict widely recognized ecological and morphological
differences, such as those between Columbina
and Metriopelia (Gibbs et al. 2001;
Sweet & Johnson 2015). Instead, Sangster et al. (2018) recommended
transferring C. mondetoura and C.
geoffroyi to a different genus. No name was available,
so they described the new genus Paraclaravis for these two species, designating
mondetoura as the type species. Apart from their molecular
distinctiveness, mondetoura and geoffroyi are united by
similarities in upperwing coverts and unmarked tertials, among other characters
(Sangster et al. 2018).
Recommendation:
I
recommend that the committee transfer Claravis
mondetoura to Paraclaravis.
Literature cited:
Gibbs,
D., Barnes, E. & Cox, J. (2001) Pigeons and Doves, a Guide to the Pigeons
and Doves of the World. Pica Press, Robertsbridge, 615 pp.
Sangster,
G., Sweet, A. D., & Johnson, K. P. (2018). Paraclaravis, a new genus for the Purple-winged and Maroon-chested
ground-doves (Aves: Columbidae). Zootaxa, 4461(1), 134–7. http://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4461.1.10
Sweet,
A. D., Maddox, J. D., & Johnson, K. P. (2017). A complete molecular
phylogeny of Claravis confirms its
paraphyly within small New World ground-doves (Aves: Peristerinae) and implies
multiple plumage state transitions. Journal of Avian Biology, 48(3),
459–464. http://doi.org/10.1111/jav.01077
Sweet, A.D. &
Johnson, K.P. (2015) Patterns of diversification in small New World ground
doves are consistent with major geologic events. Auk, 132, 300–312.
Submitted by: Nicholas A.
Mason, UC Berkeley
Date of proposal: 14 February 2019
Comments
from Stiles: “YES: recognition of Paraclaravis is clearly required by the genetic evidence.”
Comments
from Claramunt: “YES. The phylogenetic evidence
is robust, being supported independently by mtDNA and BF5. The alternative of
merging most Claravinae into a single genus is unpalatable.”
Comments
from Pacheco:
“828A. YES; 828B. YES.
The adoption of Paraclaravis and the adjustment in sequence are fully
supported by the data presented in the two cited articles.”
Comments from Zimmer: “YES” to both. The data are
solid regarding the polyphyly of Claravis
as currently constituted. The mondetoura/geoffroyi pairing relative to
the type species (pretiosa) makes
sense on several levels: morphologically
(larger size, white outer rectrices, wing pattern), vocally (double-noted calls
versus single-noted calls), and ecologically (both mondetoura and geoffroyi
are low-density, nomadic species that track episodic bamboo-seeding
events). So this change makes perfect
sense, and simultaneously avoids dumping multiple genera into a single
heterogeneous mess.”
Comments
from Jaramillo:
“B YES. I see no problems or
complexities here.”
Comments
from Stotz:
“YES. Straightforward and puts us in
agreement with NACC.”