Proposal (926) to South
American Classification Committee
Change linear sequence
of species in Epinecrophylla
This
proposal would alter the current linear sequence of species in Epinecrophylla
based on phylogenetic information.
Background: SACC’s current linear
sequence for the genus Epinecrophylla is as follows (Remsen et al.
2021):
Epinecrophylla fulviventris
Epinecrophylla gutturalis
Epinecrophylla leucophthalma
Epinecrophylla haematonota
Epinecrophylla amazonica
Epinecrophylla spodionota
Epinecrophylla ornata
Epinecrophylla erythrura
New
Information:
Johnson
et al. (2021) published a phylogeny of Epinecrophylla based on roughly
2,500 ultraconserved element loci. All species-level relationships in the genus
received full statistical support and were consistent across phylogenetic
methods. Below is a screenshot for part of Figure 2A that shows the phylogeny
estimated for all individuals in ExaBayes. In that
phylogeny, all nodes received full statistical support unless denoted by a
circle.
In
contrast to the species-level relationships, the phylogenetic position of the
taxon pyrrhonota was inconsistent across analyses, but this taxon is not
currently considered a species by the SACC, so is not relevant to the linear
sequence. A separate proposal will be submitted regarding the taxonomic status
of pyrrhonota.
The
species tree estimated in SNAPP using all sampled taxa is shown below, which
better illustrates the species-level relationships in the genus. The DensiTree cloudogram is shown on
the left (A) and the species tree on the right (B). Note the differing position
of pyrrhonota with regard to haematonota/fjeldsaai, in
comparison to the phylogeny shown above. Regardless of the taxonomic status of pyrrhonota,
the placement of E. haematonota in the linear sequence would come before
E. amazonica and E. spodionota.
Analysis:
Following
the SACC conventions of placing species-poor lineages first in the linear
sequence, and species-rich lineages last, plus the northwest-to-southeast
convention for sister species, the updated linear sequence would be:
Epinecrophylla fulviventris
Epinecrophylla ornata
Epinecrophylla erythrura
Epinecrophylla leucophthalma
Epinecrophylla gutturalis
Epinecrophylla haematonota
Epinecrophylla spodionota
Epinecrophylla amazonica
Recommendation:
I
recommend a YES vote to change the current sequence to the new sequence,
which better reflects the phylogeny proposed by Johnson et al. (2021).
Literature
Cited:
Johnson, O., J. T.
Howard, and R. T. Brumfield. 2021. Systematics of a Neotropical clade of
dead-leaf-foraging antwrens (Aves: Thamnophilidae; Epinecrophylla).
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 154: 106962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2020.106962
Remsen, J. V., Jr., J.
I. Areta, E. Bonaccorso, S. Claramunt, A. Jaramillo, D. F. Lane, J. F. Pacheco,
M. B. Robbins, F. G. Stiles, and K. J. Zimmer. Version November 2021. A
classification of the bird species of South America. American Ornithological
Society. http://www.museum.lsu.edu/~Remsen/SACCBaseline.htm
Oscar
Johnson, November 2021
Comments
from Remsen:
“YES. Sequence
must be changed to match solid phylogenetic data.”
Comments
from Robbins:
“YES for the new sequence.”
Comments
from Lane:
“YES. The phylogenetic study indicates that Oscar’s new arrangement is the best
one.”
Comments from Areta: “YES. The new sequence matches the
phylogenetic information of Johnson et al. (2021).”
Comments from Pacheco: “YES. The proposed linear sequence
is well supported by the published data.”
Comments
from Claramunt:
“YES. The new sequence reflects well the phylogenetic relationships.”
Comments
from Stiles:
“YES.”
Comments
from Jaramillo:
“YES. The linear sequence change looks logical and based on good data.”