Proposal (642) to South American Classification Committee
Elevate subspecies Agelaioides badius fringillarius (Pale Baywing) to species rank
In my
recent HBW chapter on the Icteridae (Fraga 2011), I treated the Bay-winged
Cowbird/Baywing as two separate species, Gray Baywing (A. badius) and Pale Baywing (A.
fringillarius). (See SACC proposal 641 for rationale for
use of “Baywing.). Below is the rationale
for the split.
The Pale Baywing was described as Icterus fringillarius by Spix in 1824
from Minas Gerais, Brazil. Up to
Friedmann´s classical monograph (1929), it was treated as a full species (Agelaioides fringillarius). Hellmayr (1937) treated fringillarius as a well-marked subspecies of Grayish Baywing. Jaramillo and Burke (1999) suggested that the
Pale Baywing might deserve species rank. The official Brazilian checklist recognizes
this form as a species. In Brazil the
Pale Baywing is regarded as an endemic species of the Caatinga biome (Pacheco
2000).
After
observing Pale Baywings in NE Brazil, I accepted this view in the HBW (Fraga
2011). This proposal presents the case
for species rank for the Pale Baywing. The
Grayish Baywing would then include only two subspecies, badius and bolivianus.
1)
Allopatric status of the Pale Baywing and Grayish Baywing
Most
recent references (Ridgely & Tudor 1989, Fraga 2011) show the ranges of
Grayish and Pale Baywings as separated by a large geographic gap extending from
Mato Grosso do Sul to central Minas Gerais. The natural vegetation in this gap
was mostly cerrado.
Willis
& Oniki (1982) reported Grayish Baywings from São Paulo state, Brazil. This record was repeated by Fraga (1986, 1998)
and Ridgely & Tudor (1989). However,
it is based on mistaken identifications of mimetic young Screaming Cowbirds
(Willis & Oniki 1993), and therefore invalid. Other recent records of Baywings from central
Brazil (e. g. Goiás state, Bagno & Rodrigues 1998) may be based on a
similar mistake, because the authors saw the putative Baywings flocking with
Chopi Blackbirds, a main host of Screaming Cowbirds.
At the
northern edge of their range in Paraguay Grayish Baywings do not occur in the
Atlantic Forest or Cerrado formations (Hayes 1995, and my pers. obs.). Grayish
and Pale baywing distributions are a good example of the well-known
Chaco-Caatinga biogeographical disjunction (Sick 1993) shared with many species
of plants and animals. Although baywings occur in human-modified habitats,
there is no evidence of a range expansion in central Brazil.
2)
Plumage differences
The
overall sandy coloration of Pale Baywings is unique in the genus. The dusky
areas around the eyes of Pale Baywings extend further down in the postocular
region than in Grayish baywings.
3)
Behavioral differences
Group
singing is more developed in Grayish than in the Pale Baywing (Fraga & D’Angelo
Neto 2014). An agonistic collective
display of Grayish Baywings (“Leaf Gathering”; Fraga 1981) was not observed in
Pale Baywings. Cooperative breeding is
found in all baywings, but seems more developed in Pale Baywings (Fraga &
D´Angelo Neto 2014).
4) Vocal
differences
I use
here examples available in the xeno-canto website. I also include four figures with sonograms
from my recordings of Grayish Baywings (nominate badius and bolivianus)
and Pale Baywings.
Figure 1
shows the contact calls of Grayish Baywings from subspecies badius (A) and bolivianus (B). Localities are Estancia La Candelaria, Buenos
Aires, Argentina, and P. N. Tunari, Cochabamba, Bolivia. The first calls are “chucks” resembling those
found in many species of quiscaline icterids (Orians & Angell 1985). Far more distinctive is the second call, a
short loud whistle with variable harmonics, transcribed as “peeoh” by Friedmann
(1929). It is commonly heard from flying
individuals, but perched individuals commonly exchange such calls before taking
flight. It is also heard from perched
individuals lacking visual contact, such as before sunrise or in dense fog. Sometimes “peooh” whistles are included in
songs. Both calls show some geographic variation but remain recognizable.
I never
heard “peeoh” calls from Pale Baywings. Their
commonest calls (fig. 2) are loud, hook-shaped ascending notes, with a variable
number of harmonics. Perched individuals
at roosts produce a considerable amount of noise with these calls. Groups flying away from roosts also produce
the calls. In such contexts the hook-shaped notes appear to be contact calls. In my own recordings from Minas Gerais
hook-shaped calls may have many variants, which can be produced by a single
bird in less than a minute (as in fig. 2). In the last call the individual was flying
away. During my observations of nesting
groups bursts of loud hook-shaped calls occurred when Pale Baywing groups
detected and attacked nest predators, also functioning as an alarm call.
The
hook-shaped calls are the most distinctive vocalizations of Pale Baywings, as
nothing similar occurs in Grayish Baywings. Examples from xeno-canto can be found at 2.7
to 4 s in XC84580
(obtained in Minas Gerais). In XC4548 from Pernambuco there
are 8 such calls (the sound is somewhat saturated in this cut).
Other
calls of Grayish and Pale Baywings look similar and have similar behavioral
contexts, such as the scolding call (a harsh “krrp”) and the begging calls of
fledglings. See examples XC84580 and XC4548.
The
songs of Grayish and Pale Baywings show recognizable differences. Figure 3 shows one song from a breeding banded
individual from Estancia La Candelaria, Buenos Aires. Good examples from Grayish Baywings songs can
be found in xeno-canto: Brazil (XC84387 and XC128630),
Paraguay (XC15608),
Uruguay (XC7889)
and Argentina (XC50789). Note the overall similarity across a large
geographic area. Songs of Grayish Baywings contain ascending and descending
whistles, also trills, series of clicks and flute-like notes.
Figure 4
shows one song from a Pale Baywing attending a nest near Francisco Sá, Minas
Gerais. Examples of similar song fragments from Pale Baywings are available in
xeno-canto: XC84579
and XC84580.
Songs of Pale Baywings are simpler and
less musical, lacking trills and flute-like notes, and contain mostly slow
descending whistles. Songs are slower, softer, and more hesitant in Pale
Baywings.
Summary
Besides plumage, there are important
differences in social behavior, contact calls and song between Grayish and Pale
Baywings.
References
Bagno, M. A., and F. H. G. Rodrigues. 1998. Novos registros
de aves para o estado de Goiás, Brasil. Ararajuba 6:64-65.
Fraga,
R. M. 1991. The social system of a communal breeder, the baywinged cowbird Molothrus badius. Ethology 89:195-210.
Fraga,
R. M. 2011. Family Icteridae, New World Blackbirds, p 684-801. In: del Hoyo J.,
Elliot A. & Christie D. (eds.) Handbook of the Birds of the World vol. 16,
Lynx Edicions, Barcelona, Spain.
Fraga,
R. M. and S. D´Angelo Neto. 2014. Natural history notes and breeding of the
Pale Baywing (Agelaioides fringillarius)
in northern Minas Gerais, Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia, 22:
238-241.
Friedmann,
H. 1929. The Cowbirds. C. C. Thomas,
Springfield, Illinois, USA.
Hayes,
F. E. 1995. Status, distribution and
biogeography of the birds of Paraguay. Monographs in Field Ornithology no.
1. American Birding Association.
Hellmayr, C. E. 1937. Catalogue
of birds of the Americas. Vol. 12 Icteridae. Field Museum Natural History
13: 1-228.
Jaramillo, A., and P. Burke. 1999. New World Blackbirds. The icterids. Princeton Univ. Press,
Princeton, N. Jersey.
Orians, G. and T. Angell.1985. Blackbirds of the Americas. University of Washington Press.
Pacheco,
J. F. 2000. A ornitologia descobre o sertão: um balanço do conhecimento da avifauna
da caatinga dos primordios aos annos 1950, p. 11-70. In: Straube F. C.,
Argel-de-Oliveira M. M. & Candido-Jr. J. F. (eds.) Ornitologia Brasileira
no século XX. Universidade do Sul de Santa Catarina and Sociedade Brasileira de
Ornitologia, Curitiba, Brazil.
Ridgely, R. S., and G. Tudor. 1989. The Birds of South America. Vol. 1, the Oscine Passerines. The
University of Texas Press, Austin.
Sick, H. 1993. Birds
in Brazil. A Natural History. Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ.
Willis, E. O., and Y. Oniki. 1985. Bird specimens new for
the state of Sao Paulo, Brazil. Revista Brasileira Biologia 45:105-108.
Willis, E. O., and Y. Oniki. 1993. New and reconfirmed birds
from the state of Sao Paulo, Brazil, with notes on disappearing species. Bulletin
British Ornithologists’ Club113: 23-?.
Rosendo M. Fraga, August 2014
Figure 1. Contact calls of Grayish
Baywings (“chuck” and “peeoh”) from Argentina and Bolivia
Figure 2. Hook-shaped calls of a single
individual Pale Baying, showing variants.
Figure
3. Song of a banded Grayish Baywing near its nest
Figure
4. Song of a Pale Baywing near its nest
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Comments from Zimmer: “YES”. This squares with my field observations
regarding vocal and morphological differences between these two taxa, and it
sounds as if there may be some differences in behavior/social structure as
well. These differences also reflect a
biogeographical pattern seen in Gray-crested vs. Caatinga cacholotes (which we
recognize as distinct species), the chaco
vs. caatinga subspecies of Nystalus striolatus (which SACC does not
recognize as distinct), the wagtail-tyrants (Stigmatura) and others. The
only question in my mind is whether the handful of spectrograms presented in
the proposal, along with the other evidence presented, meets our standard of
rigor as regards published analysis. My
perception that it does (barely) is no doubt influenced by my own field-based
preconceptions on this issue, and I could certainly understand others feeling
that we should wait for a more thorough, peer-reviewed, published analysis.”
Comments from Robbins: “YES. Fraga does a
good job of highlighting the differences between these two taxa and this is an
excellent example of how and why online audio resources should be used in
supporting proposals, regardless if they have been formally published. This
committee often provides a more rigorous evaluation than many published papers
that lacked proper vetting (i.e., inappropriate reviewers, editors ignoring
appropriate reviewer’s comments, etc.).”
Comments from Stiles: “YES, the evidence presented by Fraga
seems quite convincing.”
Comments
from Jaramillo: “YES
– I am very excited that Fraga has been able to put together these
observations, recordings and make a solid case. The information available to us
for the Icterids book was very scant, but even with what was available it
seemed a very convincing case for two species at the time. Now even more so.
As a note
on the English Name, I would very much prefer that the concise Baywing be left
for badius rather than Gray or
Grayish Baywing. There is precedence for this, Pale Sand Martin for Riparia diluta, versus Sand Martin for
…. well the Bank Swallow Riparia riparia.
So Baywing and Pale Baywing still seem appropriate, and these names have now
been out for nearly 15 years or so.
Response from Remsen: “Concerning
Alvaro’s comment above … If the proposal passes, there is NO WAY one could be
called Baywing and the other Something Baywing.
This violates every principle of standardization of English names.”
Comments
from Pacheco:
“YES. The arguments raised by Chendo are
perfectly in line with my experience with these taxa. I totally agree with the
proposal, a case already anticipated by Jaramillo & Burke’s Monograph.”
Comments
from Remsen: “NO. The
plumage differences mean only that they are separate taxa, worthy of
recognition minimally at subspecies rank.
The differences in social systems seem to be only a matter of degree or
based on small N. Intraspecific
geographic variation in social system structure is known for several
species. That leaves the vocal data,
which I am convinced from what I see provide solid evidence for species rank
for the two taxa …. but the data are not published per se. Chendo could take this proposal and turn it
into a short MS for RBO with just a little additional work. Although HBW and CBRO, those treatments are
not based, as far as I can tell, on published primary literature.”
Comments from Cadena: “NO. I'm with Van
on this one - see my comments on proposal 630 for my views on cases involving
unpublished analyses regardless of how different taxa may look. Here the most
important piece of the story seem to be vocalizations, but these have not been
fully analyzed with appropriate sample sizes, formal tests, etc., and no paper
documenting results has been published.”